Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/jax.js

Monday, May 12, 2025

Guess we'll still never know ...

Now that you’ve determined the values of a and b, let’s analyze the rest of Stephen’s statement. Is it true that losing in five games is “closer to a sweep than a seven-game series”? Let p4 represent the probability that the Celtics sweep the Knicks in four games. And let p7 represent the probability that the series goes to seven games (with either team winning).

Suppose p is randomly and uniformly selected from the interval (a,b), meaning we take it as a given that the most likely outcome is that the Knicks will lose the series in five games. How likely is it that p4 is greater than p7? In other words, how often will it be the case that losing in five games means a sweep is more likely than a seven-game series?

As we saw earlier, for any value of p(35,34), we have p4=p4. Similarly, we have p7=P(C,7p)+P(K,7p)=20p3(1p)3. We can solve for the point at which we have p4(p)=p7(p) and get the cubic equation 20(1p)3p=0, or substituting t=1p we get t3+120t120=0. Using Cardano's formula, given that the discriminant when p=120 and q=120 is Δ=q24+p327=11600+1432000=172700>0, we have the solution t=3140+1301730+31401301730, so the equilibrium point between p4 and p7 occurs at p=1t=13140+1301730314013017300.676582453403. So if p were uniformly samples from U(35,34) then the probability that a sweep is more probable than a seven-game series is p353435=20p1230.510549689351.

No comments:

Post a Comment